​SCHEDULE SHUFFLE

• Issue: Lack of Human Intervention. The AI scheduled the capable student into a lower-level class despite the teacher’s strong recommendation. This indicates missing human input: it fits the “Lack of Human Intervention” issue (AI decision made without sufficient human override).

• Human in the Loop: Allow teachers to review and override AI-generated schedules. In practice, when a teacher contests an AI placement, a human scheduler or teacher input should reconsider the decision.

• Risk Level: Medium. Misplacing a student academically can significantly affect learning outcomes, but it’s often correctable.
   

• Decision: Mitigate. We would address this by adding a review step, not simply accept the flawed schedule. By involving a human decision-maker (the teacher or administrator), we prevent the AI from unilaterally misplacing students.